That seems to be a less kind and less gentle approach than the one Merkley took on Jan. 8, when he vowed in a press release to "Improve No Child Left Behind."
That same day, his chief Democratic rival, Steve Novick, called for the repeal of NCLB.
It's apparent that the Merkley camp figured out fairly quickly that Novick's bolder call to abolish the bad law was resonating better with voters than did Merkley's watered-down plan for a fix. So give Merkley credit for understanding the old maxim that if you can't beat 'em, join 'em (or at least co-opt their ideas).
On a side note: I find this incident of Merkley "borrowing" Novick's rhetoric especially ironic, given the recent embarrassingly mismanaged attempt by blogger Senate Guru 2008 to paint Novick as a campaign copycat. Seems it's Merkley who's the more deserving target of the Guru's plagiarism scrutiny.
2 comments:
That sounds pretty desperate Maddest Dog. Where is the difference in policy between Merkley's web page and his letter to Spellings?
Are you criticizing Merkley for wanting to improve upon a bad policy? You're criticizing a legislator for wanting to improve upon a law? Do you know how stupid that sounds, dude?
Sure sounds stupid when you say it. Fortunately, I never did.
I was simply pointing out that Merkley changed his luke-warm rhetoric to match Novick's bolder statement.
Post a Comment